A Three-Year In-House Build, Replaced by MCIM

The exterior of a large data center, parking lot and entrance.

At scale, even well-resourced teams can underestimate what it takes to build operations software that actually works. In this case study, real-world results reveal how MCIM’s purpose-built platform outperforms internal builds in mission-critical operations.

Background

A leading global data center operator faced a strategic crossroads familiar to many large-scale infrastructure organizations: whether to extend an existing Salesforce investment with a custom-built operations management solution or adopt MCIM as a purpose-built platform designed specifically for the industry.

Confident in their internal capabilities and motivated by a desire for full control, the organization committed to the build path, assembling a dedicated engineering team of approximately ten developers to construct a bespoke asset and operations management system on top of Salesforce.

The Challenge: When Internal Builds Hit Their Limits

Over a three-year period, the team invested heavily in design, development, and iteration. Despite meaningful time and capital expenditure, the internal solution consistently fell short on three critical dimensions:

  • Scalability – The system struggled to keep pace with the operator’s growing global portfolio, requiring repeated rearchitecting as the business expanded.
  • Standardization – Without an industry-specific data model, workflows remained fragmented across sites and teams, undermining the visibility and consistency needed for mission-critical operations.
  • Operational impact – Replicating the depth of functionality required for complex, high-availability environments proved far more difficult than anticipated, leaving key use cases underserved.

The organization also faced persistent development overhead: engineering resources that could have supported core business initiatives were continually consumed by maintenance, bug fixes, and incremental feature work.

The Turning Point: Seeing the Gap in Real Time

In parallel with the internal build effort, the organization had deployed MCIM within a portion of its portfolio. The contrast was difficult to ignore. MCIM delivered clean, standardized data, integrated workflows, and meaningful improvements in operational visibility; outcomes the internal solution had not been able to consistently achieve. Faced with the evidence, leadership made a decisive strategic call: rather than continue investing in the in-house build, they would expand MCIM across additional data centers globally.

The Outcome: A Platform Built for the Way Data Centers Operate

The transition marked a fundamental shift, from a costly, multi-year internal development effort to a scalable, production-ready platform that accelerated time-to-value from day one. Key results included:

  • A unified system of record consolidating data, workflows, and operations across sites
  • Improved reliability and decision-making at scale
  • Reallocation of engineering resources toward higher-value initiatives
  • Reduced operational risk from a stable, continuously maintained platform

This organization’s experience illustrates a pattern seen repeatedly across the industry: the complexity of building purpose-built operations infrastructure is routinely underestimated. Three years of development and significant engineering investment ultimately reinforced a conclusion that many operators have reached, adopting an industry-proven platform delivers faster outcomes, lower risk, and stronger long-term ROI than attempting to replicate that depth of functionality internally.

For data center operators evaluating a similar decision today, the question isn’t simply whether an internal build is possible, it’s whether the time, cost, and opportunity cost are justified when MCIM already exists as a proven, production-ready alternative.

SHARE THIS POST

Related content

Get the latest facility and asset management tips, industry news, and updates.

Platform